From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754323Ab0CYOIr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:08:47 -0400 Received: from server78.greatnet.de ([83.133.96.102]:33442 "EHLO server78.greatnet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753137Ab0CYOIp (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:08:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4BAB6E65.7@nachtwindheim.de> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:08:37 +0100 From: Henrik Kretzschmar User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang CC: isdn@linux-pingi.de, davem@davemloft.net, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] isdn: Cleanup Sections in PCMCIA driver sedlbauer References: <1269518732-4515-1-git-send-email-henne@nachtwindheim.de> <20100325121610.GB5069@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20100325121610.GB5069@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wolfram Sang schrieb: > Hi Henrik, > > thanks for the work. Please, just keep the placement of those attributes > consistent. Otherwise it might be easy to miss: > > >> -static int sedlbauer_config(struct pcmcia_device *link); >> +static int sedlbauer_config(struct pcmcia_device *link) __devinit ; >> > > Wrong. > > >> -static int sedlbauer_probe(struct pcmcia_device *link) >> +static int __devinit sedlbauer_probe(struct pcmcia_device *link) >> { >> > > Right. > > (I think checkpatch checks for this, too) No, checkpatch doesn't claim about that. Greets, Henrik