From: "Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler bug: process running since 5124095h
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:49:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAF1802.8070002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BADD408.8080609@gmail.com>
On 03/27/2010 11:46 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Peter,
>
> top has just shown me this:
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
> 6524
> edwin 20 0 228m 10m 8116 R 2 0.3 5124095h gkrellm
>
> Now obviously that process is not running since 5124095h!
> It looks like some overflow to me, the time in nanoseconds would be
> approx 0xFFFFFE1D2D476000, which is approx. minus 34 minutes.
> Thats about consistent with the uptime, but I don't know why it became
> negative:
> 11:45:48 up 42 min, 9 users, load average: 0.56, 0.25, 0.19
>
> I've attached the cfs-debug-info.sh output.
>
> This happens when using Linux 2.6.33 (actually glisse's drm-radeon tree
> which is based on 2.6.33), its the first time I noticed this.
>
> I don't know what caused it, the last things I did was:
I have a simple way to reproduce this:
1. Boot the system, run top, confirm everything is normal
2. Run latencytop, and quit (I used version 0.5)
3. Run top, see 5124095h in the TIME column
For example:
6649 daemon 20 0 74500 8892 3796 S 6 0.2 0:00.03 debsecan
4255 root 20 0 8908 360 260 S 2 0.0 0:00.04 irqbalance
1 root 20 0 10332 692 580 S 0 0.0 5124095h init
The processes that get the 5124095h seem random, but there are plenty of
them (if you sort by 'T', the entire top display is filled with
processes running since 5124095h).
Best regards,
--Edwin
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-28 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4BADD408.8080609@gmail.com>
2010-03-28 8:49 ` Török Edwin [this message]
2010-03-29 10:52 ` scheduler bug: process running since 5124095h Mike Galbraith
2010-03-29 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-29 11:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-03-29 12:04 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-03-30 6:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-03-30 8:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-03-30 9:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-03-30 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 9:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-03-30 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BAF1802.8070002@gmail.com \
--to=edwintorok@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox