From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754575Ab0C2SI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:08:29 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:39486 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752770Ab0C2SI1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:08:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4BB0ED4F.2080102@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:11:27 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] kmemcheck: build failure after merge of the slabh tree References: <20100329154208.009a8ae2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100329092513.6e6faf2a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4BB0EAD0.2030807@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB0EAD0.2030807@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/30/2010 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> mm/kmemcheck.c also needs slab.h added to it: > > But this one is something I missed from the mainline (my script didn't > check for isolated SLAB_* flag usages). I'll take this one into the > slabh tree. Thanks for reporting this. :-) Applied to slabh branch. Thanks. -- tejun