From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753761Ab0C3TeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:34:11 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:33498 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752139Ab0C3TeH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:34:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4BB251EB.5010008@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:32:59 -0500 From: Jason Wessel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Tejun Heo , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Hicks Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slabh tree References: <20100329160248.e15e7836.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20100329160248.e15e7836.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2010 19:32:58.0426 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD9791A0:01CAD03F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/29/2010 12:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > After merging the slabh tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c: In function 'kdb_strdup': > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c:309: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmalloc' > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c:309: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c: In function 'debug_kfree': > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c:810: error: implicit declaration of function 'kfree' > > Caused by commit d103d3b3e8512312b5254950035366d4422a479a ("percpu: don't > implicitly include slab.h from percpu.h") from the slabh tree interacting > with commit 5572dd736e5577dfefafe2ad3b54760e8323e33d ("kdb: core for kgdb > back end (1 of 2)") from the kgdb tree. > > I applied the following merge fixup patch which should be applied to the > kdbg tree (see Documentation/SubmitChecklist Rule #1 :-)). > > But of course. This is applied and will appear in kgdb-next in the next hour. Thanks, Jason.