public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Ftrace and Systemtap
@ 2010-03-31 17:36 swb6
  2010-03-31 19:26 ` Tim Bird
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: swb6 @ 2010-03-31 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,
I am currently writing up my
dissertation based on dynamic tracing and reducing the learning curve to
understanding the UNIX kernel. I used two dynamic tracing technologies
(Systemtap and Dtrace) to monitor some virtual machines on a network.
Whilst going over my initial review of technologies in the area of dynamic
tracing I realised I had underestimated ftrace, and even dismissed it as
not being dynamic. However I read hear (http://lwn.net/Articles/343766/)
that you were as of July last year trying to introduce a patch that would
allow ftrace the ability to dynamically trace. Also it would be completely
instrumented from the command line without the need to compile a kernel
module al la Systemtap.

My question is do you think Systemtap will be replaced by ftrace in the
future if so I feel I may need to include this fact in my updated
technology review.

Than you for your time
Steve Brown


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-31 19:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-31 17:36 Ftrace and Systemtap swb6
2010-03-31 19:26 ` Tim Bird

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox