linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	hpa@zytor.com, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:47:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB3B4DB.7040904@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100331134048.da4e35a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On 03/31/2010 01:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:11:00 +0530
> Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> wrote:
> 
>> > On latest git, I'm seeing "start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled
>> > early" messages on ARM (sample log below).
>> > 
>> > This appears to be caused by:
>> > 
>> >   start_kernel -> radix_tree_init -> kmem_cache_create (slub) ->
>> >    down_write -> __down_write (lib/rwsem-spinlock.c) -> spin_unlock_irq
>> > 
>> > radix_tree_init was moved earlier by:
>> > 
>> >   commit 773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
>> >   Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>> >   Date:   Wed Feb 10 01:20:33 2010 -0800
>> > 
>> >       init: Move radix_tree_init() early
>> > 
>> >       Prepare for using radix trees in early_irq_init().
>> > 
>> >       Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>> >       LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-30-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
>> >       Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
>> > 
> That's going to be hard to fix.
> 
> Once upon a time, enabling interrupts too early in boot would kill
> powerpc boxes stone dead.  From the lack of noise I assume that this is
> not happening in current kernels for some reason.
> 
> We have two checks in start_kernel():
> 
> 	if (!irqs_disabled()) {
> 		printk(KERN_WARNING "start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were "
> 				"enabled *very* early, fixing it\n");
> 		local_irq_disable();
> 	}
> 	rcu_init();
> 	radix_tree_init();
> 	/* init some links before init_ISA_irqs() */
> 	early_irq_init();
> 	init_IRQ();
> 	prio_tree_init();
> 	init_timers();
> 	hrtimers_init();
> 	softirq_init();
> 	timekeeping_init();
> 	time_init();
> 	profile_init();
> 	if (!irqs_disabled())
> 		printk(KERN_CRIT "start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were "
> 				 "enabled early\n");
> 
> perhaps the second one isn't needed?  Perhaps no architecture requires
> that local interrupts be disabled across the above initialisations?
	
spin_unlock_irq from arm is different from other archs?

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-31 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 19:41 start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Rabin Vincent
2010-03-31 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 20:47   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-03-31 20:52     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:28         ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 22:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-01 14:27           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 20:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-02 14:46             ` David Howells
2010-04-02 14:54               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 19:09           ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-08 15:55             ` Américo Wang
2010-03-31 21:01     ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:17         ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:54             ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:30                 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 22:37                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:49                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  1:17                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:26                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:26                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  3:33                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:48                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:15                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 11:06                             ` David Howells
2010-04-01 15:55                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-01 23:00                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01  6:50                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 15:57               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:05     ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:31     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58     ` David Howells
2010-04-01  9:41       ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-01 11:23         ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-04-01 10:50       ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BB3B4DB.7040904@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).