* Re: [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review
@ 2010-04-01 1:52 Jayson R. King
2010-04-01 3:42 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jayson R. King @ 2010-04-01 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Stable team, LKML, Theodore Ts'o
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.27.46 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
>
> Responses should be made by April 1, 2010, 22:00:00 UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Greg,
I don't see the ext4 stable patches that Ts'o signed off on the 15th for
.27.y. :( Did you get those?
Thanks,
Jayson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review
2010-04-01 1:52 [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review Jayson R. King
@ 2010-04-01 3:42 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 4:39 ` Jayson R. King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-04-01 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jayson R. King; +Cc: Stable team, LKML, Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:52:19PM -0500, Jayson R. King wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.27.46 release.
> > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > Responses should be made by April 1, 2010, 22:00:00 UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Greg,
>
> I don't see the ext4 stable patches that Ts'o signed off on the 15th for
> .27.y. :( Did you get those?
they are still in my "to-apply" queue, see the message before this one
for why I have not applied them yet. they should make it for the next
release.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review
2010-04-01 3:42 ` Greg KH
@ 2010-04-01 4:39 ` Jayson R. King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jayson R. King @ 2010-04-01 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Stable team, LKML, Theodore Ts'o
On 03/31/2010 10:42 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> they are still in my "to-apply" queue, see the message before this one
> for why I have not applied them yet. they should make it for the next
> release.
My apologies! :( I did not see that email earlier. I hope all is going well.
Thanks,
Jayson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* 4 stable kernel review cycles starting
@ 2010-03-30 23:03 Greg KH
2010-03-30 23:04 ` [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-03-30 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable, stable-review, torvalds, akpm, alan
Hi all,
Well, I up and moved cities and caused a bunch of stable patches to be
backlogged. I've caught up with all of the ones that were marked as
being wished to be applied to the stable trees, and still have a bunch
of pending requests still queued up in my mailbox.
But, due to the number of the current patches already applied, it is
time to just let these go and work on the other pending stuff after
this.
So don't worry, if anyone has asked for some patches to be applied to
some stable trees, and you don't see it here, just give it some time,
I'm still catching up on things (hey, I'm just happy I have an internet
connection again...)
Oh, and yes, here's a .31 update. I had a bunch of pending patches for
that tree sitting around, and thought it wise to just push it out for
the distros that still rely on it to sync up and make sure they get all
of the bugfixes that are known. I don't think I'll do another .31
releaase again, just this once.
thanks,
greg "surrounded by boxes" k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review
2010-03-30 23:03 4 stable kernel review cycles starting Greg KH
@ 2010-03-30 23:04 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-03-30 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: stable-review, torvalds, akpm, alan
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.27.46 release.
There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
Responses should be made by April 1, 2010, 22:00:00 UTC.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.27.46-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt | 6 +++-
Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/ia32/ia32_aout.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 ++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 21 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86_emulate.c | 5 ++-
drivers/char/mem.c | 3 ++
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 4 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/r128/r128_cce.c | 18 +++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/r128/r128_drv.h | 8 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/r128/r128_state.c | 36 ++++++++++---------
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/lm78.c | 23 ++++++++----
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 5 ++-
drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-dvb.c | 1 +
drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c | 1 -
drivers/net/b44.c | 3 +-
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 ++++
drivers/net/r8169.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/sky2.c | 4 ++-
drivers/parisc/eisa_eeprom.c | 2 +-
drivers/serial/8250.c | 7 ++--
drivers/usb/core/devio.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c | 7 ++--
drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 11 +++---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c | 1 +
fs/exec.c | 3 +-
fs/ext4/super.c | 3 +-
fs/fcntl.c | 6 +--
fs/namei.c | 14 ++++++-
include/asm-x86/checksum_32.h | 3 +-
include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h | 1 +
include/asm-x86/kvm_x86_emulate.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 24 ++++++++++++-
include/linux/topology.h | 4 +-
kernel/futex.c | 28 +++++++++++++-
kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched.c | 12 +++---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 13 +++++--
kernel/sched_features.h | 1 +
kernel/sched_idletask.c | 6 ++--
kernel/sched_rt.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 34 +++++++++++------
mm/migrate.c | 3 ++
net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/sit.c | 2 +-
net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +
net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 ++-
49 files changed, 301 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-01 5:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-01 1:52 [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review Jayson R. King
2010-04-01 3:42 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 4:39 ` Jayson R. King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-30 23:03 4 stable kernel review cycles starting Greg KH
2010-03-30 23:04 ` [00/45] 2.6.27.46-stable review Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox