From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [Patch V3] bonding: fix potential deadlock in bond_uninit()
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:30:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB44BAC.2070304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r5mzsnuh.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> bond_uninit() is invoked with rtnl_lock held, when it does destroy_workqueue()
>> which will potentially flush all works in this workqueue, if we hold rtnl_lock
>> again in the work function, it will deadlock.
>>
>> So move destroy_workqueue() to destructor where rtnl_lock is not held any more,
>> suggested by Eric.
>
> The error handling on creating a bond device needs to be updated as well.
>
Done.
[-- Attachment #2: drivers-net-bonding-bond_main_c-fix-destroy_workqueue-deadlock.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2517 bytes --]
V3: fix error handling path of bond_create()
bond_uninit() is invoked with rtnl_lock held, when it does destroy_workqueue()
which will potentially flush all works in this workqueue, if we hold rtnl_lock
again in the work function, it will deadlock.
So move destroy_workqueue() to destructor where rtnl_lock is not held any more,
suggested by Eric.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 5b92fbf..61f8c63 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -4450,6 +4450,14 @@ static const struct net_device_ops bond_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid = bond_vlan_rx_kill_vid,
};
+static void bond_destructor(struct net_device *bond_dev)
+{
+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
+ if (bond->wq)
+ destroy_workqueue(bond->wq);
+ free_netdev(bond_dev);
+}
+
static void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
@@ -4470,7 +4478,7 @@ static void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
bond_dev->ethtool_ops = &bond_ethtool_ops;
bond_set_mode_ops(bond, bond->params.mode);
- bond_dev->destructor = free_netdev;
+ bond_dev->destructor = bond_destructor;
/* Initialize the device options */
bond_dev->tx_queue_len = 0;
@@ -4542,9 +4550,6 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev)
bond_remove_proc_entry(bond);
- if (bond->wq)
- destroy_workqueue(bond->wq);
-
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev);
bond_mc_list_destroy(bond);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
@@ -4956,8 +4961,8 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name)
bond_setup);
if (!bond_dev) {
pr_err("%s: eek! can't alloc netdev!\n", name);
- res = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
dev_net_set(bond_dev, net);
@@ -4966,19 +4971,16 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name)
if (!name) {
res = dev_alloc_name(bond_dev, "bond%d");
if (res < 0)
- goto out_netdev;
+ goto out;
}
res = register_netdevice(bond_dev);
- if (res < 0)
- goto out_netdev;
out:
rtnl_unlock();
+ if (res < 0)
+ bond_destructor(bond_dev);
return res;
-out_netdev:
- free_netdev(bond_dev);
- goto out;
}
static int __net_init bond_net_init(struct net *net)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-01 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-01 6:06 [Patch V2] bonding: fix potential deadlock in bond_uninit() Amerigo Wang
2010-04-01 6:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-01 6:54 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-01 7:30 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-04-02 0:26 ` [Patch V3] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB44BAC.2070304@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).