From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751897Ab0DEJLi (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 05:11:38 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:58791 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145Ab0DEJLb (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 05:11:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4BB9A929.2000303@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:11:05 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , LKML Subject: [PATCH] tracing: kill wrong message when cat tracing/trace Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Because of a local variable is not initialized, I got these when I did 'cat tracing/trace'. (not trace_pipe): CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446612133255294080 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffffffff816cfb98 dcache_lock See peek_next_entry(), it does not set *lost_events when we 'cat tracing/trace' Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 0498beb..b9be232 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ __find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, int *ent_cpu, { struct ring_buffer *buffer = iter->tr->buffer; struct trace_entry *ent, *next = NULL; - unsigned long lost_events, next_lost = 0; + unsigned long lost_events = 0, next_lost = 0; int cpu_file = iter->cpu_file; u64 next_ts = 0, ts; int next_cpu = -1;