public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] block: factor out bd_may_claim()
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:52:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBC55DD.2010201@kernel.org> (raw)

Factor out bd_may_claim() from bd_claim(), add comments and apply a
couple of cosmetic edits.  This is to prepare for further updates to
claim path.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
Jens, these two patches fix a subtle problem in block device open path
where O_EXCL open attempts can interfere with an already exclusively
open device.

These definitely are not for this merge window and need to get good
amount testing in linux-next.

Thanks.

 fs/block_dev.c |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: work/fs/block_dev.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/fs/block_dev.c
+++ work/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -660,41 +660,70 @@ void bd_forget(struct inode *inode)
 		iput(bdev->bd_inode);
 }

-int bd_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
+/**
+ * bd_may_claim - test whether a block device can be claimed
+ * @bdev: block device of interest
+ * @whole: whole block device containing @bdev, may equal @bdev
+ * @holder: holder trying to claim @bdev
+ *
+ * Test whther @bdev can be claimed by @holder.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock(&bdev_lock).
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * %true if @bdev can be claimed, %false otherwise.
+ */
+static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, struct block_device *whole,
+			 void *holder)
 {
-	int res;
-	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
-
-	/* first decide result */
 	if (bdev->bd_holder == holder)
-		res = 0;	 /* already a holder */
+		return true;	 /* already a holder */
 	else if (bdev->bd_holder != NULL)
-		res = -EBUSY; 	 /* held by someone else */
+		return false; 	 /* held by someone else */
 	else if (bdev->bd_contains == bdev)
-		res = 0;  	 /* is a whole device which isn't held */
+		return true;  	 /* is a whole device which isn't held */

-	else if (bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder == bd_claim)
-		res = 0; 	 /* is a partition of a device that is being partitioned */
-	else if (bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder != NULL)
-		res = -EBUSY;	 /* is a partition of a held device */
+	else if (whole->bd_holder == bd_claim)
+		return true; 	 /* is a partition of a device that is being partitioned */
+	else if (whole->bd_holder != NULL)
+		return false;	 /* is a partition of a held device */
 	else
-		res = 0;	 /* is a partition of an un-held device */
+		return true;	 /* is a partition of an un-held device */
+}

-	/* now impose change */
-	if (res==0) {
+/**
+ * bd_claim - claim a block device
+ * @bdev: block device to claim
+ * @holder: holder trying to claim @bdev
+ *
+ * Try to claim @bdev.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 if successful, -EBUSY if @bdev is already claimed.
+ */
+int bd_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
+{
+	struct block_device *whole = bdev->bd_contains;
+	int res = -EBUSY;
+
+	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
+
+	if (bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder)) {
 		/* note that for a whole device bd_holders
 		 * will be incremented twice, and bd_holder will
 		 * be set to bd_claim before being set to holder
 		 */
-		bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders ++;
-		bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder = bd_claim;
+		whole->bd_holders++;
+		whole->bd_holder = bd_claim;
 		bdev->bd_holders++;
 		bdev->bd_holder = holder;
+		res = 0;
 	}
+
 	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
 	return res;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_claim);

 void bd_release(struct block_device *bdev)

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-07  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-07  9:52 Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-04-07  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: implement bd_claiming and claiming block Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BBC55DD.2010201@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ott@mirix.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox