From: Michael Schnell <mschnell@lumino.de>
To: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: atomic RAM ?
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:52:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBDA742.9010507@lumino.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBDA1CB.3070204@davidnewall.com>
On 04/08/2010 11:28 AM, David Newall wrote:
> Will the system use multiple cores? If it's only single core, perhaps
> atomic operations are really necessary?
At the moment I am just planning a single core NIOS project. But SMP is
a decent option for NIOS, as it is no hardware problem - and often has
been requested - to design multiple CPUs in a single in such an FPGA and
run SMP Linux on it.
OTOH, to do FUTEX in full (MMU) - Linux, atomic operations are
definitively necessary, as in Userland you can't disable the interrupt
without a Kernel call (which to avoid FUTEX is all about.) Currently the
plan with the NIOS (MMU, non-SMP) arch is to simulate atomic operations
with the said "atomic region" (as is done with e.g. the BlackFin arch).
(BTW.: when enumerating the ways how atomic macros are done I forgot to
mention the "new ARM" method: dedicated "load locked, store conditional"
operations that help simulating atomic behavior in user space without
the Kernel's help.)
-Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-08 7:32 atomic RAM ? Michael Schnell
[not found] ` <4BBDA1CB.3070204@davidnewall.com>
2010-04-08 9:52 ` Michael Schnell [this message]
2010-04-12 12:54 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-14 8:42 ` Michael Schnell
[not found] ` <k2gbca41b4c1004080243nc45a10aereaae18557808c943@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-08 10:12 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-08 10:45 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-08 12:11 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-08 12:14 ` David Miller
2010-04-08 12:30 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-08 14:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-09 10:54 ` Michael Schnell
[not found] ` <4BBEECC8.10005@lumino.de>
[not found] ` <201004091714.04990.arnd@arndb.de>
2010-04-12 9:58 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-12 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-13 10:11 ` Michael Schnell
[not found] ` <u2j42b5547a1004120845x87d7f2f7wd4acea1144153dd6@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-13 8:39 ` [Nios2-dev] " Michael Schnell
2010-04-08 13:37 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 10:55 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-09 11:54 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 12:53 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-09 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 13:14 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-09 13:32 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-14 12:46 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-14 12:57 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-14 14:38 ` Michael Schnell
2010-04-09 1:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-04-09 9:23 ` Michael Schnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBDA742.9010507@lumino.de \
--to=mschnell@lumino.de \
--cc=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox