From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Liang Li <liang.li@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
yinghai@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: let 'reservetop' functioning right
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBEA1E4.1050205@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409032316.GA19938@localhost>
On 04/08/2010 08:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:12:18PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/2010 05:43 PM, Liang Li wrote:
>>
>>> When specify 'reservetop=0xbadc0de' kernel parameter, the kernel will
>>> stop booting due to a early_ioremap bug that relate to commit 8827247ff.
>>>
>>> The root cause of boot failure problem is the value of 'slot_virt[i]'
>>> was initialized in setup_arch->early_ioremap_init. But later in
>>> setup_arch, the function 'parse_early_param' will modify 'FIXADDR_TOP'
>>> when 'reservetop=0xbadc0de' being specified.
>>>
>>> The simplest fix might be use __fix_to_virt(idx0) to get updated value
>>> of 'FIXADDR_TOP' in '__early_ioremap' instead of reference old value
>>> from slot_virt[slot] directly.
>>>
>>>
>> While I guess this patch works OK, I have to say that I'm worried by the
>> need for it at all; it seems to be papering over a more serious
>> problem. reserve_top_address() is supposed to be called very early,
>> before anything has used or referenced FIXADDR_TOP. If we're seeing
>> problems with FIXADDR_TOP changing after it has been used, then it means
>> that reserve_top_address() is being called too late. Fixing that would
>> be the real fix.
>>
> The ideal thing is FIXADDR_TOP should not be touched after
> early_ioremap_init. The late call to reserve_top_address is from
> parse_reservetop, aka when reservetop=0xabcd0000 being passed as kernel
> commandline parameter. In setup_arch, the call sequence is:
>
> setup_arch
> -> early_ioremap_init
> -> parse_early_param
> -> parse_reservetop
> ->reserve_top_address
>
> See, how could we solve the confliction better?
>
Well, the first question is "do we need the reservetop= kernel
parameter"? Zach added it, I think, so that VMI could be loaded
dynamically as a module. Given that VMI is deprecated anyway, I wonder
if we can just drop support for modular VMI and remove the reservetop=
kernel parameter. Or are there other uses for it?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 0:43 [PATCH v3] x86: let 'reservetop' functioning right Liang Li
2010-04-09 3:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-09 3:23 ` Liang Li
2010-04-09 3:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-04-09 3:52 ` Liang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBEA1E4.1050205@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=liang.li@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox