From: Matt Hsu <matt@0xlab.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Subject: Why doesn't W1 sub system support UART implementation as bus master?
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:08:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC6C977.1070407@0xlab.org> (raw)
Hi,
I was managed to implement battery driver based on W1 protocol.
Its master bus is implemented by UART port. The driver status is almost
done.
And I plan to send patches for upstream.
Before that, I would like to know why it's not yet supported UART port
as bus master.
Are there considerations on this? Anything do I miss?
PS. please loop me in the mail thread.
Cheers,
Matt
reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC6C977.1070407@0xlab.org \
--to=matt@0xlab.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox