* [PATCH] kvm: don not fail when cache is sufficient
@ 2010-04-17 9:02 Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-21 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2010-04-17 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, LKML, kvm
cleanup: don not fail when cache is sufficient
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index c8c074c..90f666e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
while (cache->nobjs < ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects)) {
obj = kmem_cache_zalloc(base_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!obj)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return cache->nobjs >= min ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = obj;
}
return 0;
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
while (cache->nobjs < ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects)) {
page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!page)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return cache->nobjs >= min ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
set_page_private(page, 0);
cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page_address(page);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm: don not fail when cache is sufficient
2010-04-17 9:02 [PATCH] kvm: don not fail when cache is sufficient Lai Jiangshan
@ 2010-04-21 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-04-21 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, LKML, kvm
On 04/17/2010 12:02 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> cleanup: don not fail when cache is sufficient
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan<laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index c8c074c..90f666e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> while (cache->nobjs< ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects)) {
> obj = kmem_cache_zalloc(base_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!obj)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return cache->nobjs>= min ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = obj;
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> while (cache->nobjs< ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects)) {
> page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!page)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return cache->nobjs>= min ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> set_page_private(page, 0);
> cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page_address(page);
> }
>
>
Have you ever observed this? My feeling is that if we're a few pages
from -ENOMEM, it doesn't really matter if we die now or a few calls
away. Note alloc_page() can call back into kvm via the shrinker to free
pages, so an OOM will be external to kvm and we won't really be able to
handle it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-21 8:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-17 9:02 [PATCH] kvm: don not fail when cache is sufficient Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-21 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox