From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi: Only register one si per bmc
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:03:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCF5A09.80404@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100421182154.GA16436@srcf.ucam.org>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:09:45PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
>
>> If I understand this correctly, this would really be "Only register one
>> si per system". Unfortunately, there are systems that have more than
>> one BMC each with their own interface.
>>
>
> The spec explicitly says that while a system may have multiple BMCs,
> only one BMC may respond to GetDeviceID (6.11 of the 2.0 spec). Is the
> real world irritatingly incompatible with this?
>
That section is quite misleading. There may be management controllers
that are not BMCs, and they may have system interfaces. There may only
be on BMC in a system, though, per the spec. That really has more to do
with event handling and the main SDR repository, though.
However, IBM makes some systems that can plug together for scalability.
Each individual system has a BMC, and when you plug them together into
an SMP system, all the BMCs are still there. At least that's how I
understand it. I'm not sure if the other BMCs become satellite MCs in
that case, which would be legit, sort of. So I guess the answer to you
question would be: "Yes, the world is not compatible with the spec".
-corey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 18:40 [PATCH 1/3] ipmi: Split device discovery and registration Matthew Garrett
2010-04-20 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] ipmi: Only register one si per bmc Matthew Garrett
2010-04-20 18:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] ipmi: Change device discovery order Matthew Garrett
2010-04-21 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] ipmi: Only register one si per bmc Corey Minyard
2010-04-21 18:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-21 20:03 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2010-04-21 20:10 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCF5A09.80404@acm.org \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox