From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:50:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD41063.9010704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BD3E89C.8090307@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 04/25/2010 10:00 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Split kvm_sync_page() into kvm_sync_page() and kvm_sync_page_transient()
> to clarify the code address Avi's suggestion
>
> kvm_sync_page_transient() function only update shadow page but not mark
> it sync and not write protect sp->gfn. it will be used by later patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong<xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index abf8bd4..60a91c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,23 @@ static void kvm_unlink_unsync_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>
> static int kvm_mmu_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
>
> +static int kvm_sync_page_transient(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> +{
> + if (sp->role.cr4_pae != !!is_pae(vcpu)) {
> + kvm_mmu_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu.sync_page(vcpu, sp)) {
> + kvm_mmu_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + kvm_mmu_flush_tlb(vcpu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
>
This isn't a split; it duplicates the code.
Since there are some parts in the middle of kvm_sync_page() you don't
want in sync_page_transient(), you can put them into helpers so that
sync_page and sync_page_transient only call helpers.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-25 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4BD3E306.4020202@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/10] KVM MMU: fix for calculating gpa in invlpg code Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 9:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-26 3:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-26 7:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM MMU: convert mmu tracepoints Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM MMU: move unsync/sync tracpoints to proper place Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM MMU: cleanup invlpg code Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 9:50 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-26 3:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM MMU: don't write-protect if have new mapping to unsync page Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 10:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-26 3:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-26 6:07 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-25 7:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at gfn mapping time Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at getting sp time Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:02 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM MMU: separate invlpg code form kvm_mmu_pte_write() Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 9:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-26 3:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-25 7:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM MMU: optimize sync/update unsync-page Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD41063.9010704@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox