From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760275Ab0EEDK2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 23:10:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47820 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755086Ab0EEDK0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 23:10:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4BE0E27C.7040200@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:14:04 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091001) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Changli Gao CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila , Eric Dumazet , penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman , ebiederm@xmission.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, David Miller Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap References: <20100430082912.5630.82405.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100430082936.5630.67682.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Changli Gao wrote: > add the following lines to let "echo 1-10 >> > /proc/..." work as normal. Hmm, I haven't tested this, what did you see if we append lines into it? Also, do we need appending lines to this /proc file when design it? Octavian? Eric? Thanks.