From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Marcelo Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Suspicious compilation warning
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:06:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE14335.10702@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420230719.GB1432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hello.
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> I get this warning while compiling for ARM/SA1100:
>>>
>>> mm/sparse.c: In function '__section_nr':
>>> mm/sparse.c:135: warning: 'root' is used uninitialized in this function
>>>
>>> With a small patch in fs/proc/meminfo.c, I find that NR_SECTION_ROOTS
>>> is zero, which certainly explains the warning.
>>>
>>> # cat /proc/meminfo
>>> NR_SECTION_ROOTS=0
>>> NR_MEM_SECTIONS=32
>>> SECTIONS_PER_ROOT=512
>>> SECTIONS_SHIFT=5
>>> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS=32
>>>
>> hm, who owns sparsemem nowadays? Nobody identifiable.
>>
>> Does it make physical sense to have SECTIONS_PER_ROOT > NR_MEM_SECTIONS?
>>
>
> Well, it'll be about this number on everything using sparsemem extreme:
>
> #define SECTIONS_PER_ROOT (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof (struct mem_section))
>
> and with only 32 sections, this is going to give a NR_SECTION_ROOTS value
> of zero. I think the calculation of NR_SECTIONS_ROOTS is wrong.
>
> #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS (NR_MEM_SECTIONS / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT)
>
> Clearly if we have 1 mem section, we want to have one section root, so
> I think this division should round up any fractional part, thusly:
>
> #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS ((NR_MEM_SECTIONS + SECTIONS_PER_ROOT - 1) / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT)
>
There's DIV_ROUND_UP() macro for this kind of calculation.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 23:27 Suspicious compilation warning Marcelo Jimenez
2010-04-20 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-20 23:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-04 17:35 ` Marcelo Jimenez
2010-05-04 17:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-04 18:16 ` Marcelo Jimenez
2010-05-05 10:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2010-05-06 1:24 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-05-06 13:24 ` Marcelo Jimenez
2010-05-10 15:40 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE14335.10702@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox