public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM MMU: don't write-protect if have new mapping to unsync page
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:30:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE28C40.2060501@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE2818A.5000301@cn.fujitsu.com>

Two cases maybe happen in kvm_mmu_get_page() function:

- one case is, the goal sp is already in cache, if the sp is unsync,
  we only need update it to assure this mapping is valid, but not
  mark it sync and not write-protect sp->gfn since it not broke unsync
  rule(one shadow page for a gfn)

- another case is, the goal sp not existed, we need create a new sp
  for gfn, i.e, gfn (may)has another shadow page, to keep unsync rule,
  we should sync(mark sync and write-protect) gfn's unsync shadow page.
  After enabling multiple unsync shadows, we sync those shadow pages
  only when the new sp not allow to become unsync(also for the unsyc
  rule, the new rule is: allow all pte page become unsync)

Changlog:
- fix for forget to mark parent's unsync_children bit when mapping a new
  parent to unsync shadow page

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |   18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 72238ec..1dbb96e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	unsigned index;
 	unsigned quadrant;
 	struct hlist_head *bucket;
-	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, *unsync_sp = NULL;
 	struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
 
 	role = vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role;
@@ -1352,20 +1352,30 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, tmp, bucket, hash_link)
 		if (sp->gfn == gfn) {
 			if (sp->unsync)
-				if (kvm_sync_page(vcpu, sp))
-					continue;
+				unsync_sp = sp;
 
 			if (sp->role.word != role.word)
 				continue;
 
+			if (!direct && unsync_sp &&
+			      kvm_sync_page_transient(vcpu, unsync_sp)) {
+				unsync_sp = NULL;
+				break;
+			}
+
 			mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
 			if (sp->unsync_children) {
 				set_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, &vcpu->requests);
 				kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
-			}
+			} else if (sp->unsync)
+				kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
+
 			trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
 			return sp;
 		}
+	if (!direct && unsync_sp)
+		kvm_sync_page(vcpu, unsync_sp);
+
 	++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
 	sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_page(vcpu, parent_pte);
 	if (!sp)
-- 
1.6.1.2




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4BE2818A.5000301@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-05-06  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-05-06  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at gfn mapping time Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at getting sp time Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM MMU: rename 'root_count' to 'active_count' Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-07  3:57   ` [PATCH v5 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM MMU: support keeping sp live while it's out of protection Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-07  3:58   ` [PATCH v5 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:31 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM MMU: separate invlpg code form kvm_mmu_pte_write() Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:31 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM MMU: no need atomic operation for 'invlpg_counter' Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06  9:31 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM MMU: optimize sync/update unsync-page Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE28C40.2060501@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox