From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756687Ab0EFTN6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 15:13:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:49153 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756139Ab0EFTN5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 15:13:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4BE314CD.6060701@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 12:13:17 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: asdf@kroah.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Rozenfeld , Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , Peter Zijlstra , Haiyang Zhang , Hank Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: detect running on a HyperV system References: <20100506190841.GA1605@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20100506190841.GA1605@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/06/2010 12:08 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > x86-maintainers, we need this patch in the tree to get a -staging driver > to work properly. If you don't object, can I take it through the > staging tree? Or do you want to take it in -tip? > I'd prefer to take it in -tip, partly because I would like to rework a few things -- including preexisting braindamage like c->x86_hyper_vendor (since when was hypervisor vendor a per-cpu property!?) I'll try to get to it today, if not feel free to bug me. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.