From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@intel.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86 FPU API
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:48:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE7C857.1000600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273135546-29690-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On 05/06/2010 11:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Currently all fpu accessors are wedded to task_struct. However kvm also uses
> the fpu in a different context. Introduce an FPU API, and replace the
> current uses with the new API.
>
> While this patchset is oriented towards deeper changes, as a first step it
> simlifies xsave for kvm.
>
Peter/Ingo, what are the plans for merging it? The kvm xsave work
depends on this.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 8:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86 FPU API Avi Kivity
2010-05-06 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:39 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Eliminate TS_XSAVE tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2010-05-12 0:18 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Use the proper asm constraint in use_xsave() tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 1:06 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 21:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:38 ` Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for x86 anymore? H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 23:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-05-20 0:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 0:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-18 20:58 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-27 20:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpufeature: Unbreak compile with gcc 3.x tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 1:06 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Use static_cpu_has() to implement use_xsave() tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-06 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Introduce 'struct fpu' and related API Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:39 ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2010-05-10 20:40 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Unbreak FPU emulation tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-10 8:48 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-05-10 15:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86 FPU API H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE7C857.1000600@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dexuan.cui@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).