public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from void function()'s
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:37:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEA226D.3080103@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273629234.20514.333.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>

On 05/11/2010 06:53 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> Just a stat from arch/x86:
> 
> There may be a little over 2000 void functions in arch/x86/,
> 40 use returns before the trailing brace.
> 
> Call it churn or consistency, <shrug>.
> 

No, please get something straight:

Consistency is not an end in itself.  Readability is, however.

Avoiding churn, however, is *also* an end in itself.  Sometimes churn is
motivated by an increase in readability.  Churn is *not* motivated just
for "consistency" unless it improves readability.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12  0:39 [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from void function()'s Joe Perches
2010-05-12  0:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12  1:00   ` Joe Perches
2010-05-12  1:53     ` Joe Perches
2010-05-12  3:37       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-05-12  3:51         ` Joe Perches
2010-05-12  3:58           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12  4:37             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BEA226D.3080103@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox