From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753554Ab0ELGeI (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 02:34:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27828 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751044Ab0ELGeE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 02:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4BEA4BD4.6070207@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:33:56 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Graf CC: Zachary Amsden , Glauber Costa , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] pvclock misc fixes - v4. References: <1273594667-17175-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4BEA21A1.8040702@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/2010 08:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > How about stable queuing of this one? > Only after this gets some serious field testing. I'm not happy to trade a known issue for an unknown regression. While I don't expect any problems with the patchset, testing has often proven me wrong. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.