From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756103Ab0ELXtX (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 19:49:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:44246 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754100Ab0ELXtW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 19:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4BEB3CD5.9060803@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:42:13 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , "Ostrovsky, Boris" , "Herrmann3, Andreas" , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Jiri Benc , Thomas Renninger , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "stable-review@kernel.org" , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [stable] [113/197] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indices References: <20100422190917.467545308@kvm.kroah.org> <20100505180228.GC15804@aftab> <20100506081721.GA20616@aftab> <20100506141358.GB20994@aftab> <20100512231906.GB3588@kroah.com> <4BEB3A77.1020907@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4BEB3A77.1020907@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/2010 04:32 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/12/2010 04:19 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> >>> So if K8_NB has failed initializing for some reason, we never go near >>> the pci devs and the node_to_k8_nb_misc() calls since we effectively >>> disable the L3 functionality. >>> >>> Thus the NULL pointer checks you remove in the patch below are >>> superfluous, I agree, and I have already removed those in my tree along >>> with the other improvements/fixes I'm working on right now. >> >> So, was there ever a patch applied that fixed the bug that Jiri found in >> the stable kernels with this original patch that I could apply? >> > > Sounds like this patch in -tip should be promoted to mainline/stable... > could the AMD people please confirm? > Specifically, "waiting to hit mainline" is not an option since they are currently queued for .35, but we need a minimal fix in .34 -- this is the "stable backport". If this "stable backport" is simply a subset of the patch series then let me know which ones should be moved to urgent and sent to Linus immediately. I obviously don't have access to a setup which can replicate this particular problem. -hpa