From: Andrej Gelenberg <andrej.gelenberg@udo.edu>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: linux@brodo.de, ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.shin@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] fix race condition in store_scaling_governor
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:48:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BED2A7D.1070801@udo.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100512080837.GD5718@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]
Hi,
i found the cause for the bug: it was commit "[CPUFREQ] remove rwsem
lock from CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP call (second call site)".
It release the rwsem lock in the middle of __cpufreq_set_policy, that is
not a good idea. There are no dead lock, which that patch solved,
because cpufreq_ondemand and cpufreq_conservative don't use the rwsem
lock in do_dbs_timer anymore.
Regards,
Andrej Gelenberg
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-CPUFREQ-Revert-CPUFREQ-remove-rwsem-lock-from-CPUFRE.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1430 bytes --]
>From a6f3a23ac011af636e544cd107379bc22c4dba7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrej Gelenberg <andrej.gelenberg@udo.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:39:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] Revert "[CPUFREQ] remove rwsem lock from CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP call (second call site)"
That patch is not needed, because there is no rwsem lock in cpufreq_ondemand and
cpufreq_conservativ anymore. Lock should not be released until the work done.
Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594
Signed-off-by: Andrej Gelenberg <andrej.gelenberg@udo.edu>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 +----------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 75d293e..634757f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1774,17 +1774,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *data,
dprintk("governor switch\n");
/* end old governor */
- if (data->governor) {
- /*
- * Need to release the rwsem around governor
- * stop due to lock dependency between
- * cancel_delayed_work_sync and the read lock
- * taken in the delayed work handler.
- */
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(data->cpu);
+ if (data->governor)
__cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(data->cpu);
- }
/* start new governor */
data->governor = policy->governor;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-11 14:20 [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] fix race condition in store_scaling_governor Andrej Gelenberg
2010-05-12 8:08 ` Américo Wang
2010-05-12 9:01 ` Andrej Gelenberg
2010-05-14 10:48 ` Andrej Gelenberg [this message]
2010-05-12 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-12 23:58 ` Andrej Gelenberg
2010-05-13 9:13 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BED2A7D.1070801@udo.edu \
--to=andrej.gelenberg@udo.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).