From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752602Ab0ESWpL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 18:45:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:38575 "EHLO mail-pz0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751838Ab0ESWpJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 18:45:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m5yhWrQZQMHJbHzENcCb3T5SGuu64BE4eaPsr7Uvm580oSMXVsBocgDAwRRb1GPARH yj3vtYdQx4BgjWbl+ZZQrX02tOLLaFCo/Fogc4sgQeI2GGslKG2jsXzTPcK9OJOzn3bm ox4mI6sxVqNC3qFGbgsioIEF2Z8eQJFG4gqBw= Message-ID: <4BF469F6.3050300@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:45:10 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , "Siddha\, Suresh B" , Thomas Gleixner , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for *x86* anymore? References: <4BF33CAD.2070602@zytor.com> <871vd8xb8t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4BF3F0D3.6070609@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF3F0D3.6070609@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/19/2010 07:08 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/19/2010 06:38 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> "H. Peter Anvin" writes: >>> >>> If there isn't a reason to preserve support, I would like to consider >>> discontinue support for using gcc 3 to compile x86 kernels. If there is >>> a valid use case, it would be good to know what it is. >> >> I suspect there are still distributions around that use it as a standard >> compiler. Wasn't it used in some major release of Debian? >> >> -Andi > > There are, but that doesn't mean it's relevant for people to compile > bleeding-edge kernels with it. > > -hpa > no need for it here(using 4.6.0).. Any distro still using this version should upgrade(but who am I to say anything) cheers. Justin P. Mattock