From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753929Ab0ETGGk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 02:06:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16429 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753844Ab0ETGGj (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 02:06:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF4D15E.4040908@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:06:22 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" CC: davem@davemloft.net, Juan Quintela , Rusty Russell , "Paul E. McKenney" , Arnd Bergmann , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-net: utilize PUBLISH_USED_IDX feature References: <20100518011931.GA21918@redhat.com> <4BF41A33.8090309@redhat.com> <20100519222718.GB4111@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100519222718.GB4111@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2010 01:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 08:04:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 05/18/2010 04:19 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >>> With PUBLISH_USED_IDX, guest tells us which used entries >>> it has consumed. This can be used to reduce the number >>> of interrupts: after we write a used entry, if the guest has not yet >>> consumed the previous entry, or if the guest has already consumed the >>> new entry, we do not need to interrupt. >>> This imporves bandwidth by 30% under some workflows. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >>> --- >>> >>> Rusty, Dave, this patch depends on the patch >>> "virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself" >>> which is currently destined at Rusty's tree. >>> Rusty, if you are taking that one for 2.6.35, please >>> take this one as well. >>> Dave, any objections? >>> >>> >> I object: I think the index should have its own cacheline, >> > The issue here is that host/guest do not know each > other's cache line size. I guess we could just put it > at offset 128 or something like that ... Rusty? > Not so pretty, but ok. > >> and that it should be documented before merging. >> > I think you meant to object to the virtio patch, not this one. This > patch does not introduce new layout, just implements host support. > virtio spec patch will follow: it is not part of linux tree so > there is no patch dependency. > There is a reviewer dependency. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.