From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757312Ab0EUCBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:01:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8794 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755449Ab0EUCBH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 22:01:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF5E92C.5020507@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 22:00:12 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hugh Dickins CC: KOSAKI Motohiro , Shaohua Li , Wu Fengguang , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Insert tmpfs cache pages to inactive list at first References: <20100519174327.9591.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2010 09:31 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins > > Thanks - though I don't quite agree with your description: I can't > see why the lru_cache_add_active_anon() was ever justified - that > "active" came in along with the separate anon and file LRU lists. I guess I kind of expected that function to be used by anonymous pages, when I wrote it. Except we use a different variant from do_anonymous_page :) -- All rights reversed