From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755617Ab0EUNgK (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 09:36:10 -0400 Received: from ns2.intersolute.de ([193.110.43.67]:40450 "EHLO ns2.intersolute.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754025Ab0EUNgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 09:36:08 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1314 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 09:36:07 EDT Message-ID: <4BF68721.4060602@lumino.de> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:14:09 +0200 From: Michael Schnell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.0.4-2.3 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Question about futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic References: <0D753D10438DA54287A00B0270842697636F05337A@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net> In-Reply-To: <0D753D10438DA54287A00B0270842697636F05337A@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2010 01:46 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > Should the all arch implementations be changed to use the u32 type, > I suppose the Futex variable should be a 64 bit entity with a 64 bit architecture. -Michael