From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752975Ab0EWGVQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2010 02:21:16 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:22697 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797Ab0EWGVO (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2010 02:21:14 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,285,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="801036997" Message-ID: <4BF8C954.90608@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:21:08 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Chua CC: johnstul@us.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , Frans Pop , Johannes Berg , Reinette Chatre , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: Wireless IBSS on Linux-2.6.34 broken by commit 3bbb9ec946428b96657126768f65487a48dd090c References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/2010 21:58, Jeff Chua wrote: > Wireless IBSS on Linux-2.6.34 is broken. Reverting commit > 3bbb9ec946428b96657126768f65487a48dd090c makes it work again. This was > tested by bisecting the kernel. > > I'm using 6200 AGN ... > > cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain > iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, in-tree: > iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6200 AGN, REV=0x74 > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X > iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: loaded firmware version 9.193.4.1 build 19710 can you get us whole dmesg of two cases? (just to know if there's something in surrounding messages of interest)