From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: avoid unconditionally freeing previously allocated request_queue
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:37:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFC896A.6050306@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525163455.GA10155@redhat.com>
Hi Mike,
On 05/26/2010 01:34 AM +0900, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Fully initialize a request-based queue (->elevator, ->request_fn, etc).
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int dm_init_request_based_queue(struct mapped_device *md)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct request_queue *q = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Avoid re-initializing the queue if already fully initialized */
>>>> + if (!md->queue->elevator) {
>>>> + /* Fully initialize the queue */
>>>> + q = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn, NULL);
>>>> + if (!q)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> When blk_init_allocated_queue() fails, the block-layer seems not to
>>> guarantee that the queue is still available.
>>
>> Ouch, yes this portion of blk_init_allocated_queue_node() is certainly
>> problematic:
>>
>> if (blk_init_free_list(q)) {
>> kmem_cache_free(blk_requestq_cachep, q);
>> return NULL;
>> }
Not only that. The blk_put_queue() in blk_init_allocated_queue_node()
will also free the queue:
if (!elevator_init(q, NULL)) {
blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
return q;
}
blk_put_queue(q);
return NULL;
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-26 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1274744795-9825-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1274744795-9825-3-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4BFBB21A.3030105@ct.jp.nec.com>
[not found] ` <20100525124912.GA7447@redhat.com>
2010-05-25 16:34 ` [PATCH] block: avoid unconditionally freeing previously allocated request_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-05-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/1] block: make blk_init_free_list and elevator_init idempotent Mike Snitzer
2010-05-26 2:37 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2010-05-26 4:47 ` block: avoid unconditionally freeing previously allocated request_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-05-26 4:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-06-03 16:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Snitzer
2010-06-03 17:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Mike Snitzer
2010-06-04 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFC896A.6050306@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox