* ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
@ 2010-05-26 7:04 Justin P. Mattock
2010-05-26 16:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel; +Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, Linux Kernel Mailing List
This is new:
[ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
frame
[ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned?
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
2010-05-26 7:04 ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame Justin P. Mattock
@ 2010-05-26 16:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin P. Mattock; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is new:
> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
> frame
> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>
> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned?
No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed.
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
2010-05-26 16:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is new:
>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
>> frame
>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>>
>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned?
>>
> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed.
>
> Luis
>
>
sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something
else I had kicking around..
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock
@ 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin P. Mattock; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock
>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is new:
>>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
>>> frame
>>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>>>
>>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned?
>>>
>>
>> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>
> sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something
> else I had kicking around..
Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use
instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In
fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless.
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame
2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 05/26/2010 09:40 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock
>>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> This is new:
>>>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
>>>> frame
>>>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>>>>
>>>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed.
>>>
>>> Luis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something
>> else I had kicking around..
>>
> Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use
> instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In
> fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless.
>
> Luis
>
>
alright!!
(and of course after pressing "send" I get this post!!)
Anyways I'll send another patch that I was experimenting
with(just to see!!).
cheers,
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-26 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-26 7:04 ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame Justin P. Mattock
2010-05-26 16:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).