From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759271Ab0E0RIX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:08:23 -0400 Received: from mx01.sz.bfs.de ([194.94.69.103]:51689 "EHLO mx01.sz.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757208Ab0E0RIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4BFEA700.20603@bfs.de> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:08:16 +0200 From: walter harms Reply-To: wharms@bfs.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter , Julia Lawall , HighPoint Linux Team , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/11] drivers/scsi: Eliminate a NULL pointer dereference References: <20100527165301.GU22515@bicker> In-Reply-To: <20100527165301.GU22515@bicker> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dan Carpenter schrieb: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: >> If it is a problem to use 0 when host is NULL, then the code could be fixed >> in another way. >> > > Yeah. It seems like it would be better to give a clearly bogus number. > I would have said -1 but "scsi-1" looks normal so maybe something like > 9999999? > lets spend some bytes: if (host) dprintk("scsi%d: hptiop_probe failed\n",host->host_no); else dprintk("scsi: no host, hptiop_probe failed\n"); re, wh