From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758210Ab0E1OW3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 10:22:29 -0400 Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.65]:57227 "HELO 64.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756647Ab0E1OW1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 10:22:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4BFFD19F.5020601@example.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 16:22:23 +0200 From: Piotr Hosowicz Reply-To: piotr@hosowicz.com Organization: hosowicz.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100515 Icedove/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: piotr@hosowicz.com CC: Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Divyesh Shah , Ingo Molnar , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Provide local_clock() and improve documentation References: <4BF9EC69.5030709@example.com> <1274777422.5882.591.camel@twins> <20100526160252.325f8357.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1274942798.27810.3584.camel@twins> <20100526235107.77e66ce0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1274945751.27810.3765.camel@twins> <20100527113340.d4afb8fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1275052414.1645.52.camel@laptop> <4BFFD008.4070909@example.com> In-Reply-To: <4BFFD008.4070909@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15105073150374080882 X-Ovh-Remote: 83.24.90.132 (dni132.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28.05.2010 16:15, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > On 28.05.2010 15:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> Cool, thanks. You didn't Cc a mailing list :( >> >> Oops, must have managed to wreck the CC list somewhere, restored LKML. >> >> How does the below look? > > Earlier someone (you? I didn't write down) has published such a patch: (cut patch) > Should I apply it first and then your today's patch or only the today's > patch? Sorry, no question, today's patch must have been incorporated in the git repo, I see it fails to apply again. And the earlier one also. But what about commit f4b87dee9 - should I revert it before build? Regards and sorry for the noise. Piotr Hosowicz -- - No wiesz, pijany i o trzeciej nad ranem wracasz do domu!? - A kto powiedział, że wracam? Po gitarę tylko przyszedłem. NP: Mark Knopfler - Before Gas & TV NB: 2.6.34-20100527-2020-gitt-revtd