From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:47:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C03A1C0.4020104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275302796.27810.22049.camel@twins>
Hello,
On 05/31/2010 12:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So workers _are_ thread bound and don't migrate, so for those I don't
> see the problem, that is of course until we have to break affinity when
> their CPU goes down, at which point we should clear PF_THREAD_BOUND I
> think.
>
> For the rescue thread, why not set PF_THREAD_BOUND when its running
> worklets and clear it when done? That way we get extra checking that
> people won't migrate it when its not allowed.
>
> Does that work, or did I miss something?
The rescuers migrate themselves so should be okay. I still think it
would be better to migrate back detached workers. It's a slow path
for sure but there's a big gaping hole between machine-slow and
human-slow and works can be human-slow (ie. hotplug operation not
finished in several minutes). I'll see if that's implementable w/o
adding an additional interface.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-31 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 10:48 [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:06 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 11:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: add hooks for workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-17 23:13 ` [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-21 13:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 9:08 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 10:26 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-27 8:26 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C03A1C0.4020104@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).