From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
mjg@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: x86: use acpi flags for apic mapping
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:20:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C06D91F.2060105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100602194956.GB5264@lenovo>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +enum apic_acpi_map_status apic_is_acpi_clustered_box(void)
>> +{
>
> It's a bit strange that function is "is" prefixed and returns not true or false
> but enum, perhaps we may name it apic_acpi_dst_model() or something like
> that?
>
Sure, np -- new patch.
P.
[-- Attachment #2: acpi_apic-v2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3489 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index 1fa03e0..6b63f95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -252,6 +252,14 @@ static inline int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
}
#endif
+enum apic_acpi_map_status {
+ APIC_ACPI_BOTH,
+ APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER,
+ APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL,
+ APIC_ACPI_NONE
+};
+extern enum apic_acpi_map_status apic_acpi_dst_model(void);
+
extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_mce(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_ibs(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index e5a4a1e..e94a189 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2189,6 +2189,30 @@ static const __cpuinitconst struct dmi_system_id multi_dmi_table[] = {
{}
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+enum apic_acpi_map_status apic_acpi_dst_model(void)
+{
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID) {
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL &&
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_CLUSTER) {
+ /*
+ * The rest of the code assumes physical flat
+ * in this case.
+ */
+ return APIC_ACPI_BOTH;
+ }
+
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_CLUSTER)
+ return APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER;
+
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL)
+ return APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL;
+ }
+
+ return APIC_ACPI_NONE;
+}
+#endif
+
static void __cpuinit dmi_check_multi(void)
{
if (multi_checked)
@@ -2208,6 +2232,20 @@ static void __cpuinit dmi_check_multi(void)
*/
__cpuinit int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ switch (apic_acpi_dst_model()) {
+ case APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL:
+ case APIC_ACPI_BOTH: /* assume physical flat in this case */
+ return 0;
+ break;
+ case APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER:
+ return 1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+#endif
+
dmi_check_multi();
if (multi)
return 1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
index 09d3b17..c2318ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
@@ -231,14 +231,32 @@ static int physflat_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
/*
- * Quirk: some x86_64 machines can only use physical APIC mode
- * regardless of how many processors are present (x86_64 ES7000
- * is an example).
+ * Some x86_64 machines can only use clustered or physical APIC
+ * mode regardless of how many processors are present.
*/
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID &&
- (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL)) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC only can use physical flat");
- return 1;
+ switch (apic_acpi_dst_model()) {
+ case APIC_ACPI_BOTH:
+ printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG "ACPI has set apic mode to "
+ "both clustered and physical flat. Please "
+ "contact your firmware vendor for an update.\n");
+ /*
+ * In this case assume physical flat as only a very
+ * limited number of systems use cluster
+ */
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC using physical flat\n");
+ return 1;
+ break;
+ case APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER:
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC can only use cluster\n");
+ return 0;
+ break;
+ case APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL:
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC can only use physical"
+ " flat\n");
+ return 1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
if (!strncmp(oem_id, "IBM", 3) && !strncmp(oem_table_id, "EXA", 3)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 19:29 [PATCH]: x86: use acpi flags for apic mapping Prarit Bhargava
2010-06-02 19:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-06-02 22:20 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2010-06-03 17:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-06-03 18:07 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-06-03 20:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-06-03 21:14 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-06-03 21:30 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C06D91F.2060105@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).