From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933592Ab0FCCFy (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:05:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:34895 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933549Ab0FCCFx (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:05:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MktQ0SvFW8CYtCkRGB6C8CDgEEnpyCJSiY/IRCzRjLcjGoPP0/bjHEjJhhMhmd9gX0 besvErCSF/fLavS2Y66d+LCbgAKpApvR4AvODOlg2RFfygIlPaMiAelkB1OgbUDO01LH 7DaYTF3QdY/WAzXJi4n4vliPFmddpf1q2MqVc= Message-ID: <4C070E16.6080301@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:06:14 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett CC: Robert Hancock , x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]X86:reboot.c Add some dmi entries to pci_reboot_dmi_table. References: <4C05E800.1010400@gmail.com> <4C05F3BF.6090503@gmail.com> <4C06ECAA.3060708@gmail.com> <4C06ED18.2010400@gmail.com> <4C06F1DD.8060004@gmail.com> <4C06F6EA.6090701@gmail.com> <20100603013758.GA18755@srcf.ucam.org> <20100603015659.GA19123@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20100603015659.GA19123@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/02/2010 06:56 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:47:17PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> That's pretty infuriating. The ACPI-provided definition doesn't work, >>> and there's no ACPI mechanism for expressing the more complex cf9 >>> behaviour. Windows doesn't appear to special case this, so we're >>> probably left trying to figure out why the keyboard controller method >>> doesn't work. Sigh. >> >> Do these Macs even have a PC keyboard controller? A recent thread on >> PS/2 keyboard/mouse controller probing suggests they may not.. > > Possibly an SMM trap... > >> Justin, what happens if you try the simple outb(6, 0xcf9) test program >> multiple times, does that do anything? > > Huh. That might work, yes. Windows does the ACPI write, an i8042 write, > the ACPI write, another i8042 write and then gives up. If that happens > sufficiently quickly, this might get us somewhere. Justin, can you try: > > #include > #include > > int main() { > iopl(3); > outb(6, 0xcf9); > usleep(100); > outb(6, 0xcf9); > return 0; > } > > and see if that reboots? > this thing is wacked out this just rebooted the system: int main() { iopl(3); outb(6, 0xcf9); return 0; } and now it's motionless (just a command prompt). Justin P. Mattock