From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756679Ab0FCXj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:39:26 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:60757 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754110Ab0FCXjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:39:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4C083D2C.5070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:39:24 -0700 From: Corey Ashford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: perf: tools/perf/design.txt is badly out of date Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I had a glance at tools/perf/design.txt the other day, and it appears to be pretty far out of date. Is design.txt a document that you want to keep the current way for historical reasons [and the up-to-date documentation placed somewhere else], or one that should be maintained? I'm wondering if some/all of this documentation should move into include/linux/perf_event.h - Corey