From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
josef@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.34 echo j > /proc/sysrq-trigger causes inifnite unfreeze/Thaw event
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:23:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0C7448.7040409@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100607010542.GB27325@dastard>
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:30:30PM -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> causes the FS Thaw stuff in fs/buffer.c to enter an infinite loop
>> filling the /var/log/messages with junk and causing the hard drive to
>> crank away endlessly.
>
> Hmmm, looks pretty obvious what the 2.6.34 bug is:
>
> while (sb->s_bdev && !thaw_bdev(sb->s_bdev, sb))
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Emergency Thaw on %s\n",
> bdevname(sb->s_bdev, b));
>
> thaw_bdev() returns 0 on success or not frozen, and returns non-zero
> only if the unfreeze failed. Looks like it was broken from the start
> to me.
thaw_bdev() used to return -EINVAL for not-frozen, but it no longer
does. Seems commit 4504230a dropped this:
- if (!bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count) {
- mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
in favor of this:
+ int error = -EINVAL;
...
+ if (!bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count)
+ goto out_unlock;
...
+out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
return 0;
and now we return 0 for a thaw of a non-frozen bdev ....
this breaks the loop in the emergency thaw-er (which was
just supposed to work its way through nested freezes,
when I wrote it)
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 5:30 2.6.34 echo j > /proc/sysrq-trigger causes inifnite unfreeze/Thaw event Jeffrey Merkey
2010-06-07 1:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-07 4:23 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-06-07 21:36 ` Josef Bacik
2010-06-07 21:59 ` Josef Bacik
2010-06-07 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-08 2:07 ` Josef Bacik
2010-06-08 2:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-08 12:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-08 14:56 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0C7448.7040409@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jeffmerkey@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox