From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753092Ab0FGSPV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:15:21 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:11039 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752775Ab0FGSPU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4C0D36C3.4040709@monstr.eu> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:13:23 +0200 From: Michal Simek Reply-To: monstr@monstr.eu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: LKML Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/microblaze fixes for 2.6.35-rc3 References: <4C0CF9DF.2050603@monstr.eu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Michal Simek wrote: >> please pull the following changes. > > No. See my -rc2 announcement. Also, this has clearly not even been tested, > since it's been rebased on top of a recent commit. > > So I'm being a hard-ass this time around. I don't care what subsystem it > is, I want pull requests to follow the after-merge-window rules. > Regressions, security bugs, and major oopses. Not just random changes. ok. No problem. There is only 2-3 patches which bring new functionality. The rest is bug fixes. I am going to send next pull request just with fixes. Michal > > Linus -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Microblaze U-BOOT custodian