From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:34:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C108778.71545BCF@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4C0F3C66.1020601@kernel.org
Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 01:48 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> > Yeah... bd_start_claiming() grabs a reference to gendisk and we never
> > let it go. There's your leak...
>
> Eh, I thought you were cc'd. Sorry. This was fixed sometime back by
> Nick and queued in block tree (delayed due to mail misdelivery).
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/40655
That one liner patch makes module refcount mismatch go away.
However, I am not sure if that is the right place to insert that
module_put(). The problem with Nick Piggin's (2010-05-25 15:50:21 GMT) patch
is that it makes module refcount temporarily drop to zero.
I added this line right after that "module_put(disk->fops->owner);" fix:
if(disk->fops->owner){printk("bd_start_claiming: module_refcount=%u\n", module_refcount(disk->fops->owner));}
And that said "module_refcount=0" when I tried it with my silly floppy
module mount+umount test.
Later in the mount system call handling the module refrence count is
incremented. But to me that looks like there is a window of opportunity for
things to go wrong. What is there to prevent module from being removed at
zero refcount?
--
Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-07 5:20 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken Jari Ruusu
2010-06-07 6:44 ` Al Viro
2010-06-08 23:48 ` Al Viro
2010-06-09 7:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-10 6:34 ` Jari Ruusu [this message]
2010-06-10 11:31 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C108778.71545BCF@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox