From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: don't walk every parent pages while mark unsync
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:35:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C123B93.7060803@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1239EE.3090904@cn.fujitsu.com>
While we mark the parent's unsync_child_bitmap, if the parent is already
unsynced, it no need walk it's parent, it can reduce some unnecessary
workload
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 61 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index eb20682..a92863f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator {
shadow_walk_okay(&(_walker)); \
shadow_walk_next(&(_walker)))
-typedef int (*mmu_parent_walk_fn) (struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
+typedef void (*mmu_parent_walk_fn) (struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte);
static struct kmem_cache *pte_chain_cache;
static struct kmem_cache *rmap_desc_cache;
@@ -1024,7 +1024,6 @@ static void mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
BUG();
}
-
static void mmu_parent_walk(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, mmu_parent_walk_fn fn)
{
struct kvm_pte_chain *pte_chain;
@@ -1034,63 +1033,37 @@ static void mmu_parent_walk(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, mmu_parent_walk_fn fn)
if (!sp->multimapped && sp->parent_pte) {
parent_sp = page_header(__pa(sp->parent_pte));
- fn(parent_sp);
- mmu_parent_walk(parent_sp, fn);
+ fn(parent_sp, sp->parent_pte);
return;
}
+
hlist_for_each_entry(pte_chain, node, &sp->parent_ptes, link)
for (i = 0; i < NR_PTE_CHAIN_ENTRIES; ++i) {
- if (!pte_chain->parent_ptes[i])
+ u64 *spte = pte_chain->parent_ptes[i];
+
+ if (!spte)
break;
- parent_sp = page_header(__pa(pte_chain->parent_ptes[i]));
- fn(parent_sp);
- mmu_parent_walk(parent_sp, fn);
+ parent_sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
+ fn(parent_sp, spte);
}
}
-static void kvm_mmu_update_unsync_bitmap(u64 *spte)
+static void mark_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte);
+static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
- unsigned int index;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
-
- index = spte - sp->spt;
- if (!__test_and_set_bit(index, sp->unsync_child_bitmap))
- sp->unsync_children++;
- WARN_ON(!sp->unsync_children);
+ mmu_parent_walk(sp, mark_unsync);
}
-static void kvm_mmu_update_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void mark_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte)
{
- struct kvm_pte_chain *pte_chain;
- struct hlist_node *node;
- int i;
+ unsigned int index;
- if (!sp->parent_pte)
+ index = spte - sp->spt;
+ if (__test_and_set_bit(index, sp->unsync_child_bitmap))
return;
-
- if (!sp->multimapped) {
- kvm_mmu_update_unsync_bitmap(sp->parent_pte);
+ if (sp->unsync_children++)
return;
- }
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(pte_chain, node, &sp->parent_ptes, link)
- for (i = 0; i < NR_PTE_CHAIN_ENTRIES; ++i) {
- if (!pte_chain->parent_ptes[i])
- break;
- kvm_mmu_update_unsync_bitmap(pte_chain->parent_ptes[i]);
- }
-}
-
-static int unsync_walk_fn(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
-{
- kvm_mmu_update_parents_unsync(sp);
- return 1;
-}
-
-static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
-{
- mmu_parent_walk(sp, unsync_walk_fn);
- kvm_mmu_update_parents_unsync(sp);
+ kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
}
static void nonpaging_prefetch_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 13:28 [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: rename 'page' and 'shadow_page' to 'sp' Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: MMU: cleanup for dirty page judgment Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: MMU: avoid double write protected in sync page path Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: MMU: don't mark pte notrap if it's just sync transient Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: MMU: cleanup for __mmu_unsync_walk() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: clear unsync_child_bitmap completely Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 20:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: MMU: don't mark pte notrap if it's just sync transient Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-12 2:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-11 13:35 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-06-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: don't walk every parent pages while mark unsync Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-14 22:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-15 1:32 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-15 20:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-15 20:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C123B93.7060803@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox