From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755174Ab0FPCOK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:14:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:41583 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754560Ab0FPCOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:14:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4C18337C.3040605@vflare.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:44:20 +0530 From: Nitin Gupta Reply-To: ngupta@vflare.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Hugh Dickins , Cyp , driverdev , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zram: generic RAM based compressed R/W block devices References: <1274710685-2351-1-git-send-email-ngupta@vflare.org> <4BFFEA95.9040505@vflare.org> <20100528162657.GA28781@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20100528162657.GA28781@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On 05/28/2010 09:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:38:53PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> >> On 05/24/2010 07:48 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>> Creates RAM based block devices: /dev/zramX (X = 0, 1, ...). >>> Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored in memory >>> itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides >>> good amounts of memory savings. >>> >>> This is enhancement over existing ramzswap driver which creates >>> virtual block devices (/dev/ramzswapX) which could be used only >>> as swap disks. >>> >>> Now, with the ability to handle any kind of I/O request, zram >>> devices have lot more use cases: >>> - /tmp storage >>> - various caches under /var >>> - swap disks >>> - maybe even more! :) >>> >>> Performance numbers can be found at: >>> http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/zramperf >>> >> >> Any reviews/comments, please? > > We are all busy with the .35-rc1 merge work at the moment, sorry. > Can you please apply these patches to linux-next? or maybe for .35-rc3/rc4 too? Thanks, Nitin