public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@telenet.be>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:56:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1A378F.7070604@athenacr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276781044.27822.309.camel@twins>

On 06/17/2010 09:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 12:50 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
>> sched: do not ratelimit NOHZ when the tick is stopped.
>>
>> Chris Wedgwood reports that 39c0cbe sched: Rate-limit nohz causes a serial
>> console regression, unresponsiveness, and indeed it does.  The below fixes
>> it by not skipping out when the tick has been stopped.
>>
>> Tested that the throughput benefit of ratelimiting is still intact.  It is.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Reported-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> index 5f171f0..83c5129 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>>  		goto end;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
>> +	if (!ts->tick_stopped && nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
>>  		goto end;
>>  
>>  	ts->idle_calls++;
>>  
> 
> 
> Humm,. the code around there suggests something like the below, but I
> must admit its been a while since I really read all that nohz stuff,
> Thomas, any preferences?

I tested Peter's variant, it eliminates the kvm console echo latency
that I was seeing. (I haven't tried Mike's earlier variant).

Tested-by: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>

> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    5 +----
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 5f171f0..e0707ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -315,9 +315,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>  		goto end;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
> -		goto end;
> -
>  	ts->idle_calls++;
>  	/* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */
>  	do {
> @@ -328,7 +325,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>  	} while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
>  
>  	if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || printk_needs_cpu(cpu) ||
> -	    arch_needs_cpu(cpu)) {
> +	    arch_needs_cpu(cpu) || nohz_ratelimit(cpu)) {
>  		next_jiffies = last_jiffies + 1;
>  		delta_jiffies = 1;
>  	} else {
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-10 17:25 Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?) Linus Torvalds
2010-06-10 18:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-06-10 18:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2010-06-10 22:25   ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-06-10 22:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-16 15:03     ` Jiri Kosina
2010-06-16 15:16       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17  6:39         ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17  7:00           ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 10:50             ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 13:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-17 14:11                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-17 14:14                 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 14:56                 ` Brian Bloniarz [this message]
2010-06-17 16:02                   ` [PATCH] nohz: Fix nohz ratelimit Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-17 17:39                     ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 18:45 ` Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?) Jef Driesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C1A378F.7070604@athenacr.com \
    --to=bmb@athenacr.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jefdriesen@telenet.be \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox