From: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@telenet.be>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:56:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1A378F.7070604@athenacr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276781044.27822.309.camel@twins>
On 06/17/2010 09:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 12:50 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>> sched: do not ratelimit NOHZ when the tick is stopped.
>>
>> Chris Wedgwood reports that 39c0cbe sched: Rate-limit nohz causes a serial
>> console regression, unresponsiveness, and indeed it does. The below fixes
>> it by not skipping out when the tick has been stopped.
>>
>> Tested that the throughput benefit of ratelimiting is still intact. It is.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Reported-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> index 5f171f0..83c5129 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>> goto end;
>> }
>>
>> - if (nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
>> + if (!ts->tick_stopped && nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
>> goto end;
>>
>> ts->idle_calls++;
>>
>
>
> Humm,. the code around there suggests something like the below, but I
> must admit its been a while since I really read all that nohz stuff,
> Thomas, any preferences?
I tested Peter's variant, it eliminates the kvm console echo latency
that I was seeing. (I haven't tried Mike's earlier variant).
Tested-by: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 5 +----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 5f171f0..e0707ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -315,9 +315,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
> goto end;
> }
>
> - if (nohz_ratelimit(cpu))
> - goto end;
> -
> ts->idle_calls++;
> /* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */
> do {
> @@ -328,7 +325,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
> } while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
>
> if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || printk_needs_cpu(cpu) ||
> - arch_needs_cpu(cpu)) {
> + arch_needs_cpu(cpu) || nohz_ratelimit(cpu)) {
> next_jiffies = last_jiffies + 1;
> delta_jiffies = 1;
> } else {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-17 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 17:25 Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?) Linus Torvalds
2010-06-10 18:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-06-10 18:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2010-06-10 22:25 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-06-10 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-16 15:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2010-06-16 15:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 6:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 7:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 10:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-17 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-17 14:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-17 14:56 ` Brian Bloniarz [this message]
2010-06-17 16:02 ` [PATCH] nohz: Fix nohz ratelimit Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-17 17:39 ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 18:45 ` Slow pty's (was Re: libdivecomputer interfaces?) Jef Driesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1A378F.7070604@athenacr.com \
--to=bmb@athenacr.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jefdriesen@telenet.be \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox