public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() failure on UV x86_64
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:35:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1A5CD4.3020802@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1A5679.8010907@kernel.org>

On 06/17/2010 07:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (scratching head...) So, that means it's given an address for which
> !pcpu_addr_in_first_chunk() but outside of vmalloc area.  Strange.
> I'll find out what's going on.

Does the following patch work?  The original patch assumed that @addr
would be the address of the base cpu which isn't true.  I only compile
tested the patch so it might be broken (sorry, I gotta go somewhere
now) but this should be the right direction.

Thanks.

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 46485e1..8956155 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -978,14 +978,23 @@ bool is_kernel_percpu_address(unsigned long addr)
  */
 phys_addr_t per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(void *addr)
 {
-	if (pcpu_addr_in_first_chunk(addr)) {
-		if ((unsigned long)addr < VMALLOC_START ||
-		    (unsigned long)addr >= VMALLOC_END)
-			return __pa(addr);
-		else
-			return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
-	} else
-		return page_to_phys(pcpu_addr_to_page(addr));
+	void __percpu *base = __addr_to_pcpu_ptr(pcpu_base_addr);
+	unsigned int cpu;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		void *start = per_cpu_ptr(base, cpu);
+
+		if (addr >= start && addr < start + pcpu_unit_size) {
+			/* in the first chunk */
+			if ((unsigned long)addr < VMALLOC_START ||
+			    (unsigned long)addr >= VMALLOC_END)
+				return __pa(addr);
+			else
+				return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
+		}
+	}
+	/* in one of the other chunks */
+	return page_to_phys(pcpu_addr_to_page(addr));
 }

 static inline size_t pcpu_calc_fc_sizes(size_t static_size,


-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-17 16:20 per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() failure on UV x86_64 Cliff Wickman
2010-06-17 17:08 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 17:35   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-06-17 18:24     ` Cliff Wickman
2010-06-18  9:56       ` [PATCH] percpu: fix first chunk match in per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() Tejun Heo
2010-06-18 12:30         ` Cliff Wickman
2010-06-18 13:07           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C1A5CD4.3020802@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox