From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() failure on UV x86_64
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:35:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1A5CD4.3020802@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1A5679.8010907@kernel.org>
On 06/17/2010 07:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (scratching head...) So, that means it's given an address for which
> !pcpu_addr_in_first_chunk() but outside of vmalloc area. Strange.
> I'll find out what's going on.
Does the following patch work? The original patch assumed that @addr
would be the address of the base cpu which isn't true. I only compile
tested the patch so it might be broken (sorry, I gotta go somewhere
now) but this should be the right direction.
Thanks.
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 46485e1..8956155 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -978,14 +978,23 @@ bool is_kernel_percpu_address(unsigned long addr)
*/
phys_addr_t per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(void *addr)
{
- if (pcpu_addr_in_first_chunk(addr)) {
- if ((unsigned long)addr < VMALLOC_START ||
- (unsigned long)addr >= VMALLOC_END)
- return __pa(addr);
- else
- return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
- } else
- return page_to_phys(pcpu_addr_to_page(addr));
+ void __percpu *base = __addr_to_pcpu_ptr(pcpu_base_addr);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ void *start = per_cpu_ptr(base, cpu);
+
+ if (addr >= start && addr < start + pcpu_unit_size) {
+ /* in the first chunk */
+ if ((unsigned long)addr < VMALLOC_START ||
+ (unsigned long)addr >= VMALLOC_END)
+ return __pa(addr);
+ else
+ return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
+ }
+ }
+ /* in one of the other chunks */
+ return page_to_phys(pcpu_addr_to_page(addr));
}
static inline size_t pcpu_calc_fc_sizes(size_t static_size,
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-17 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-17 16:20 per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() failure on UV x86_64 Cliff Wickman
2010-06-17 17:08 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 17:35 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-06-17 18:24 ` Cliff Wickman
2010-06-18 9:56 ` [PATCH] percpu: fix first chunk match in per_cpu_ptr_to_phys() Tejun Heo
2010-06-18 12:30 ` Cliff Wickman
2010-06-18 13:07 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1A5CD4.3020802@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox