From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: hch@lst.de, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:18:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C285AE8.9090702@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100628171218Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 2010-06-28 10:14, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:57:38 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:32:07PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:07:12 +0200
>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> How about this?
>>>>
>>>> As I tried to explain before this utterly confuses the I/O completion
>>>> path. With the patch applied even a simple mkfs.xfs that issues discard
>>>> just hangs.
>>>
>>> Wired. I just tried mkfs.xfs against scsi_debug with my block patches
>>> (I saw one discard command). Seemed that it worked fine.
>>
>> I've tracked it down to the call to scsi_requeue_command in scsi_end_request.
>> When the command is marked BLOCK_PC we'll just get it back as such in
>> ->prep_fn next time, but now it's reverting to the previous state.
>
> If scsi_end_request() calls scsi_requeue_command(), the command has a
> left over (i.e. hasn't finished all the data), right? You hit such
> condition with discard commands?
>
> BLOCK_PC requests don't hit this case since blk_end_request() always
> return false for PC.
You can get requeues on the ->queuecommand() path as well, for a
variety of reasons, and that would be what Christoph is hitting.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-18 14:59 [PATCH, RFC] block: don't allocate a payload for discard request Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-19 4:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-22 18:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-26 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 8:49 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 10:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 10:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 11:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 12:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 14:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 16:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 8:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 8:18 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-06-28 8:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 11:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-01 4:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 15:29 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-28 17:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-06-29 8:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-29 22:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-06-29 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-29 23:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-30 0:11 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-06-30 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-30 15:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-30 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-01 12:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-07-01 12:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-01 14:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-07-01 12:49 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2010-06-30 8:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 10:25 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 10:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 12:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-26 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard requests Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 14:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 14:55 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 10:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] " FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 12:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-28 15:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 15:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-28 12:34 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-28 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 12:49 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:45 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C285AE8.9090702@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).