From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756184Ab0GAOSv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:18:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5209 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756072Ab0GAOSt (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:18:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4C2CA3C7.1070302@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:18:47 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel CC: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Use u64 for gfn_t in KVM References: <1277992812-31945-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <1277992812-31945-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/01/2010 05:00 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, Avi, Marcelo, > > these two patches currently lie on the bottom of my npt-npt patch set. They > came out of a discussion on the mailing list about the last version of the > npt-npt patchset. These patches are independent of the rest of the patchset, so > I post and discuss them seperatly. The changes to make gfn_t an u64 were > larger than I expected which is another reason for the seperate post. Please > let me know what you think about this change. > > Looks good. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function