From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 20:16:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2F2A0C.90704@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 01:31 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>> See how the pte is reread inside fetch with mmu_lock held.
>>>
>>>
>> It looks like something is broken in 'fetch' functions, this patch will
>> fix it.
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: fix last level broken in FNAME(fetch)
>>
>> We read the guest level out of 'mmu_lock', sometimes, the host mapping is
>> confusion. Consider this case:
>>
>> VCPU0: VCPU1
>>
>> Read guest mapping, assume the mapping is:
>> GLV3 -> GLV2 -> GLV1 -> GFNA,
>> And in the host, the corresponding mapping is
>> HLV3 -> HLV2 -> HLV1(P=0)
>>
>> Write GLV1 and
>> cause the
>> mapping point to GFNB
>> (May occur in
>> pte_write or
>> invlpg path)
>>
>> Mapping GLV1 to GFNA
>>
>> This issue only occurs in the last indirect mapping, since if the middle
>> mapping is changed, the mapping will be zapped, then it will be detected
>> in the FNAME(fetch) path, but when it map the last level, it not checked.
>>
>> Fixed by also check the last level.
>>
>>
>
> I don't really see what is fixed. We already check the gpte. What's
> special about the new scenario?
>
I mean is: while we map the last level, we will directly set to the pfn but
the pfn is got by walk_addr, at this time, the guest mapping may be changed.
What is the 'We already check the gpte' mean? i think i miss something :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-03 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 13:53 [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 8:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 12:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 17:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 10:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:16 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-03 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 13:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 2:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 8:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 11:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 3:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2F2A0C.90704@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox