From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: MMU: track dirty page in speculative path properly
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:45:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3C35B7.50101@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3C3518.7080505@cn.fujitsu.com>
In speculative path, the page is not real write-access, no need mark it
dirty, so clear dirty bit in this path and later examine this bit when
we release the page
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 67dbafa..5e9d4a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -315,21 +315,19 @@ static void set_spte_atomic(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
if (old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
- if (is_writable_pte(old_spte))
+
+ if ((shadow_dirty_mask && (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask)) ||
+ (!shadow_dirty_mask && is_writable_pte(old_spte)))
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
}
static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
- u64 old_spte;
-
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || (new_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)) {
+ if ((!shadow_accessed_mask || (new_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)) &&
+ (!shadow_dirty_mask || (new_spte & shadow_dirty_mask)))
__set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- } else {
- old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- if (old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
- mark_page_accessed(pfn_to_page(spte_to_pfn(old_spte)));
- }
+ else
+ set_spte_atomic(sptep, new_spte);
}
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
@@ -745,7 +743,7 @@ static int rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
}
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
}
- if (write_protected) {
+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask && write_protected) {
pfn_t pfn;
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
@@ -1879,9 +1877,9 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
* whether the guest actually used the pte (in order to detect
* demand paging).
*/
- spte = shadow_base_present_pte | shadow_dirty_mask;
+ spte = shadow_base_present_pte;
if (!speculative)
- spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
+ spte |= shadow_accessed_mask | shadow_dirty_mask;
if (!dirty)
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
if (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK)
@@ -2007,7 +2005,7 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD)
rmap_recycle(vcpu, sptep, gfn);
} else {
- if (was_writable)
+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask && was_writable)
kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pfn);
else
kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-13 9:42 [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MMU: cleanup spte update path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 9:45 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-13 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: MMU: track dirty page in speculative path properly Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 1:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 11:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 13:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 14:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 14:25 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-15 7:44 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-15 16:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-16 1:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 5:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: MMU: remove valueless output message Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-14 1:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 13:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-14 13:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-14 14:27 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C3C35B7.50101@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox