From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blkdev: check for valid request queue before issuing flush
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:55:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3C6232.5090509@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279007450-10457-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On 2010-07-13 09:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Issuing a blkdev_issue_flush() on an unconfigured loop device causes a panic as
> q->make_request_fn is not configured. This can occur when trying to mount the
> unconfigured loop device as an XFS filesystem. There are no guards that catch
> the bio before the request function is called because we don't add a payload to
> the bio. Instead, manually check this case as soon as we have a pointer to the
> queue to flush.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-barrier.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-barrier.c b/block/blk-barrier.c
> index 0d710c9..0fd766e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-barrier.c
> +++ b/block/blk-barrier.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,15 @@ int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *bdev, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (!q)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + /*
> + * some block devices may not have their queue correctly set up here
> + * (e.g. loop device without a backing file) and so issuing a flush
> + * here will panic. Ensure there is a request function before issuing
> + * the barrier.
> + */
> + if (!q->make_request_fn)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 0);
> bio->bi_end_io = bio_end_empty_barrier;
> bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
This may appear ugly, but I think the patch is fine since there's not
much we can do about the loop crap (outside of changing how you do
setup/configure of it).
I'll apply this, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-13 7:50 [PATCH 0/2] Graceful failures for XFS on an unconfigured loop device Dave Chinner
2010-07-13 7:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't block on buffer read errors Dave Chinner
2010-07-14 18:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-15 0:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-13 7:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] blkdev: check for valid request queue before issuing flush Dave Chinner
2010-07-13 12:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C3C6232.5090509@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).